Ordinary people are risking their lives every day to protect vulnerable communities and a fragile environment within an increasingly restricted civic space. In 2015, 515 aid workers were reported killed, injured or kidnapped by Aid in Danger, and 100 journalists and media staff were killed according to the Committee to Protect Journalists, which also reported that 199 journalists had been imprisoned that year. Amnesty International reported that 122 countries tortured or otherwise ill-treated people and that war crimes or other violations of the laws of war were committed in at least 19 countries. High-profile attacks against NGO workers in 2016 include the rape and assault of foreign aid workers in Juba by South Sudanese troops as UN peacekeepers failed to intervene and the killing of a Syrian humanitarian aid worker and around 20 civilians in an airstrike on an aid convoy in Aleppo in September.
NGOs and board members are increasingly aware of their legal duty of care obligations to their employees following the 2015 Dennis vs. Norwegian Refugee Council case and an earlier landmark case against Samaritan’s Purse (see below). However, the danger is that organisations will either become too risk adverse or simply adopt a ‘tick box’ approach to security risk management. We seek to challenge both responses, as neither will ensure the safe and effective delivery of programmes to those in need.The danger is that NGOs will either become too risk adverse or simply adopt a 'tick box' approach to security risk managementClick To Tweet
With the support of our intelligence, training and equipment units, the aid workers and others we work with should be safe, but unforeseen or unavoidable security and medical threats do arise in the field, and our security unit means we can respond effectively when they do, including with remote medical support (by telephone or internet) and extraction and evacuation via our emergency response teams. Informed directly by the work of our innovation unit, we develop and deliver appropriate security services that address both the external threats to NGO workers and the internal vulnerabilities that place them at risk of violence. We ensure our client’s security in the widest sense as well as providing the full range of security risk mitigation services, including unarmed security advisers, site security audits, cyber security audits and counter-surveillance measures.
Such services are also of great assistance to human rights defenders, journalists and political activists who face persecution and state violence and are consistently targeted by security services. They cannot afford commercial security advice and obviously cannot turn to the police for protection. By developing networks of skills-based volunteers and building relationships with trusted partners, Open Briefing can meet those needs cost effectively.
We believe that humanitarians and other NGO workers are best secured through the acceptance of local communities, not through fortification and deterrence. All our protective services are therefore intelligence-led and based on preventative strategies and proactive measures rather than violent reactive responses. As part of this, Open Briefing operates a ‘no weapons policy’. We only deploy unarmed security advisers, as we do not wish to add further armed actors into already volatile situations.